liberty ark logo

Action Alert


March 2, 2007


Amended version of SB 486 passes the Senate and goes to the House

On Monday, SB 486 was brought up for the second reading. Senator Hershman proposed an amendment that completely replaced the original bill with a bill that barred only the mandatory animal ID and tracking phases of NAIS. The amended bill:

  1. allows mandatory premises registration to remain law and
  2. does not prevent coercive measures from being used to force people to participate in animal ID and tracking.

The amendment was adopted. The amended bill was then passed by the full Senate on Tuesday. You can read the amended bill at:
www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2007/SAMP/RS048602.002.html

SB 486 now goes to the House. Representatives Grubb (h42@in.gov) and Koch (h65@in.gov) are sponsoring SB 486 in the House. After first reading, it will be assigned to the House Agriculture and Rural Development Committee. The committee members' contact information is provided below.

ACTION: Call or write all of the members of the House Agriculture Committee. You should also call your own Representative. If you don't know who your legislator is, you can find out at:
www.in.gov/apps/sos/legislator/search/ Ask them to amend SB 486 back to its original version or, at a minimum, to bar mandatory or coercive participation in ALL of the three phases of NAIS. A sample letter and talking points are provided below.

You can get in-depth arguments against NAIS at www.libertyark.net. And, as always, if you have questions or concerns, you can reach us at noah@libertyark.net.

House Agriculture Committee:

Chair: Rep Pflum (D) h56@in.gov
Vice chair: Stemler (D) h71@in.gov
Battles (D) h64@in.gov
Bischoff (D) h68@in.gov
Dembowski (D) h17@in.gov
Goodin (D) h66@in.gov
Grubb (D) h42@in.gov
Gutwein (R) h16@in.gov
Friend (R) h23@in.gov
Knollman (R) h55@in.gov
Lehe (R) h15@in.gov
Stutzman (R) h52@in.gov

You can call all the legislators at 1-800-382-9842 (for Democrats) or 1-800-382-9841 (for Republicans)

Talking points for calls:

NAIS will hurt Indiana's economy:

Neither the USDA nor the IDA has scientific proof that NAIS will improve disease control:

NAIS is not necessary for the market. Age- and source-verification is already available through the USDA's Process Verified Program.

NAIS will not improve food safety:

NAIS will not protect against terrorism:

NAIS infringes on people's constitutional rights, including due process, privacy, and religious freedom.

NAIS unfairly attacks the rights of pet owners and those who raise animals as food for their family.

USDA states that NAIS is voluntary at the federal level, so there is no "federal mandate" requiring Indiana to implement this program.

Other states are also rejecting or limiting NAIS, so Indiana will not be disadvantaged by refusing to participate.

As amended in the Senate, SB 486 does NOT address the problems with NAIS:

Sample letter - Personalize and put it into your own words for the greatest effect!!

Dear Representative _________:

I am a ____ (small farmer, consumer, taxpayer - tell them a sentence about yourself). I am opposed to all three stages of NAIS - premises registration, animal identification, and tracking - because they impose heavy burdens on our rights and our economy, without providing any real benefits. Neither the USDA nor the Indiana State Department of Agriculture has provided any scientific basis for the claims of improved disease control. NAIS is an unprecedented expansion of the government bureaucracy into people's private lives and infringes on our property rights. NAIS will drive many small and medium-size farmers and ranchers out of business and discourage people from owning horses and other livestock as pets, resulting in far-reaching effects on our economy. The only winners in this program are the microchip manufacturers, the associations that will manage the databases, and the government employees.

I urge you to support amendments to SB 486 that would stop any portion of NAIS from being mandatory, including premises registration, and prevent coercion from being used to force people into the program. The best approach would be the one taken in the original version of SB 486, namely barring any government program at all, whether mandatory or voluntary.

Thank you for your attention to this issue.

Name
Address
City, State, Zip




| Back |

Copyright © 2007 LibertyArk.net. All rights reserved.